Award evidence

Competition award
agreement.

A descriptive comparison of broad award tiers given to the same oil release. Agreement is not a measure of competition difficulty, prestige, or selectivity.

Current scope

Generated · method v1

Tracked awards1587
Award-winning oils483
Sources compared10
Recorded scores558
EVV rated releases13

8 award entries from untracked sources excluded: LAIOOC (1), Oliveti Northland Olive Oil Awards (7).

Competition summaries

Raw awards remain distinct; tier percentages use the analysis-only grouping below.

24 oils · 2026–2026 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
1 (4%)
Silver
6 (24%)
Gold-or-higher
18 (72%)
Raw award labels
  • Best olive oil per country of origin1
  • Bronze1
  • Double Gold5
  • Gold12
  • Silver6

128 oils · 2012–2025 · 533 scored

Recorded score coverage available

Bronze
98 (17%)
Silver
237 (41%)
Gold-or-higher
249 (43%)
Raw award labels
  • Best2
  • Best in class4
  • Best in Class8
  • Best of Show1
  • Bronze98
  • Champion4
  • Gold217
  • Platinum10
  • Reserve Champion3
  • Silver237

74 oils · 2022–2025 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
19 (14%)
Silver
76 (56%)
Gold-or-higher
42 (31%)
Raw award labels
  • Best in Boutique2
  • Best in Class12
  • Best in Show2
  • Bronze19
  • Gold22
  • Reserve in Boutique2
  • Reserve in Show2
  • Silver76

49 oils · 2015–2026 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
0 (0%)
Silver
55 (37%)
Gold-or-higher
93 (63%)
Raw award labels
  • Best in Class4
  • Gold89
  • Silver55

3 oils · 2025–2026 · 0 scored

Small sample; medal labels only

Bronze
0 (0%)
Silver
0 (0%)
Gold-or-higher
4 (100%)
Raw award labels
  • Gold4

37 oils · 2020–2026 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
3 (4%)
Silver
22 (32%)
Gold-or-higher
43 (63%)
Raw award labels
  • Bronze3
  • Gold33
  • Platinum10
  • Silver22

46 oils · 2020–2026 · 25 scored

Recorded score coverage available

Bronze
10 (13%)
Silver
27 (34%)
Gold-or-higher
42 (53%)
Raw award labels
  • Bronze10
  • Gold30
  • Platinum12
  • Silver27

63 oils · 2021–2025 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
20 (12%)
Silver
84 (48%)
Gold-or-higher
70 (40%)
Raw award labels
  • Bronze20
  • Gold70
  • Silver84

142 oils · 2022–2026 · 0 scored

Medal labels only

Bronze
49 (13%)
Silver
98 (27%)
Gold-or-higher
221 (60%)
Raw award labels
  • Best of California3
  • Best of California EVOO Blend Delicate1
  • Best of California EVOO Blend Medium1
  • Best of California EVOO Blend Robust2
  • Best of California EVOO by a Artisan Producer1
  • Best of California EVOO by a Large Producer2
  • Best of California EVOO by a Micro Producer2
  • Best of California EVOO Monovarietal Delicate2
  • Best of California EVOO Monovarietal Medium2
  • Best of California EVOO Monovarietal Robust2
  • Best of California Large Producer1
  • Best of California Microproducer1
  • Best of Class38
  • Best of Show Extra Virgin Olive Oil1
  • Best of Show Monovarietal Extra Virgin Olive Oil1
  • Best of Show Olive Oil2
  • Bronze49
  • Double Gold7
  • Gold152
  • Silver98

Extra Virgin Vault Review

EVV internal review scale
13

11 oils · 0 scored

EVV internal review scale; limited sample

1 review without an award tier is preserved in the raw labels and excluded from medal analysis.

Bronze
5 (42%)
Silver
4 (33%)
Gold-or-higher
3 (25%)
Raw award labels
  • Bronze5
  • Gold-or-higher3
  • No medal1
  • Silver4

Competition agreement matrix

Compare every source against every other source. Results describe only EVV’s matched-release sample. Select a cell for the underlying detail.

Exact agreement shows how often matched releases received the same broad medal tier. Percentages are withheld below 10 comparisons.

Same-release medal-tier agreement. Rows and columns are award sources.
Y ↓ / X →Athena International Olive Oil CompetitionAustralian International Olive AwardsOlives New Zealand AwardsNew York International Olive Oil CompetitionJapan Olive Oil PrizeLondon International Olive Oil CompetitionBerlin Global Olive Oil AwardsSA Olive AwardsCalifornia State Fair EVOO CompetitionExtra Virgin Vault ReviewInternal scale
Athena International Olive Oil Competition
Australian International Olive Awards
Olives New Zealand Awards
New York International Olive Oil Competition
Japan Olive Oil Prize
London International Olive Oil Competition
Berlin Global Olive Oil Awards
SA Olive Awards
California State Fair EVOO Competition
Extra Virgin Vault ReviewInternal scale

Expanded view

Competition agreement matrix

Exact agreement shows how often matched releases received the same broad medal tier.

Selected comparison

Australian International Olive Awards vs New York International Olive Oil Competition

Limited

25 same-release comparisons across 10 shared oil files. This is observed agreement in EVV’s matched-release sample.

Exact agreement12/25 (48%)
Adjacent agreement23/25 (92%)
Directional tier differenceMedian 0 (left minus right)
Observed release years2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025
Style evidence6 matches among 15 style-comparable releases

95% Wilson intervals — exact: 30–67%; adjacent: 75–98%.

Effective-tier confusion matrix; rows are Australian International Olive Awards, columns are New York International Olive Oil Competition.
Bronze Silver Gold-or-higher
Bronze012
Silver034
Gold-or-higher069
Raw award pairs
  • Bronze / Gold2
  • Bronze / Silver1
  • Gold / Best in Class2
  • Gold / Gold7
  • Gold / Silver6
  • Silver / Gold4
  • Silver / Silver3

Recorded scores

Scores are summarised only within their original competition. Different judging scales are not placed on a shared numeric scale, and generated proxy scores are excluded.

Australian International Olive Awards

533/584

65–96 · median 83

Berlin Global Olive Oil Awards

25/79

83.97–96.88 · median 91.69

How awards are grouped

Bronze Bronze
Silver Silver
Gold Gold-or-higher
Platinum Gold-or-higher
Double Gold Gold-or-higher
Best / Champion / Reserve / Class / Show honours Gold-or-higher

Analysis uses Bronze, Silver, and Gold-or-higher only. Higher honours retain their original labels and group as Gold-or-higher for broad tier agreement.

Methodology and assumptions

Identity: Same oil content file and release year. Multiple awards from one source on that release reduce to the strongest effective tier.

Uncertainty: Rates show raw counts. A 95% Wilson interval is generated for samples of at least 10; smaller samples are labelled anecdotal.

Categories: Judging panels, categories, style classes, volume classes, and entrant pools differ. Missing style data is treated as not comparable, not as a mismatch.

Limits: Winner archive, not a record of all competition entrants. These statistics cannot determine selectivity, difficulty, prestige, or a universal award conversion.